Michael
Kimmel is the author of “‘Bros Before Hos’: The Guy Code”, an analysis of the
strict set of rules that young men follow to appear appropriately masculine.
The article details the rules, their purpose and their origins.
According to Kimmel, these rules are learned
from a very young age. They begin when young boys start to reject their mothers
and identify with their fathers, or ‘become men’. This is when boys learn the
basics of ‘boy code’: don’t cry, don’t be a wimp, etcetera. These values are
reinforced by fathers who fear their sons being rejected from male peers for being
‘sissies’. As boys get older the Guy Code is further enforced by coaches who
push young athletes to not show pain and male teachers who extol the “…explorers
or scientists [who] were so courageous and braving the elements and all that”
(611) as one young man explained.
The Guy Code is most strongly enforced by male
peers, who’s approval is key to and the goal of ‘being a man’. In fact the
purpose of the Guy Code is not to impress women but to impress other men. Kimmel
quotes playwright David Mamet as saying “Women have, in men’s minds, such a low
place on the social ladder of this country that it’s useless to define yourself
in terms of a woman. What men need is men’s approval” (611). All of the ostentatious
posturing of young men is not to gain the adoration of women, although the
adoration of women may add to their perceived manliness. What young men really
want is the admiration of other men.
The rules on Kimmel’s Guy Code top ten list are
all very familiar. Don’t cry, don’t show emotion (except anger, which is
encouraged), be stoic, don’t rely on others for help, be brave and tough, be
big and strong, quantify your masculinity with material possessions, and (possibly
most importantly) never seem gay. These rules fit the white American stereotype
of manliness that I am familiar with. Although it seems to be the ideal, I have
not seen Guy Code fully lived up to by any actual man (although a few of my family
members have made enthusiastic attempts). Not only are these rules very
restrictive, but they are very difficult to maintain. Kimmel states that “the
Guy Code fits as comfortably as a straight-jacket" (615). Masculinity (much like
femininity) is a social construction that we learn from how we see others
treated around us and how we are encouraged to act. There is nothing natural or
healthy about men being expected to never show emotion, never need help, measure
their worth in physical strength and material possessions, and categorically
reject things that they might otherwise identify with or enjoy because they are
‘un-masculine’. These standards of masculinity are damaging to men as well as
to women and our culture as a whole. I feel it would be in everyone’s best
interest to abort the whole masculine/feminine dichotomy and treat everyone
like individuals without any social expectations based on their genitalia.
You sum of the main points in the article here quite effectively, but I'd like you to work on the Rhetorical Analysis aspect of this post a bit more for your next attempt. What rhetorical strategies does the writer use to convey his ideas? Can you recognize the appeals? Use the handout as a guide when you are writing your next (and last!) RA. Thanks!
ReplyDelete